Limitations and proposed modifications of ASA score
These definitions appear in each annual edition of the ASA Relative Value Guide. There is no additional information that can be helpful to further define these categories.[3] It is logical to expect a missing category between ASA 2 and ASA 3 for a systemic disease which is neither mild nor severe, but is of moderate nature. It is also not clear what will be the ASA score of a patient who is suffering simultaneously from two, three or more systemic diseases (which might be of different severity).
Different authors give different versions of this ASA definition.[4] It is because this classification is vague and far from perfect. Many authors try to explain it on the basis of ‘functional limitation’ or ‘anxiety’ of patient which are not mentioned in the actual definition. Often different anesthesia providers assign different scores to the same patient.[5][6][7][8]. The word ’systemic’ in this classification creates a lot of confusion. For example, heart attack (myocardial infarction), though grave, is a ‘local’ disease and is not a ’systemic’ disease, so a patient with recent (or old) heart attack, in the absence of any other systemic disease, does not truly fit in any category of the ASA classification, yet has poor post-surgery survival rates. Similarly cirrhosis of the liver, COPD, severe asthma, peri-nephric abscess, badly infected wounds, intestinal perforation, skull fracture etc. are not systemic diseases. These, and other severe heart, liver, lung, intestinal or kidney diseases, although they greatly affect physical status of patient and risk for poor outcomes, cannot be labelled as “systemic disease” (which means a generalized disorder of the whole body like hypertension or diabetes mellitus). Local diseases can also change physical status but has not been mentioned in ASA classification.
This scoring system assumes that age of the patient has no relation to physical fitness, which is not true. Neonates and the elderly, even in the absence of any systemic disease, tolerate otherwise similar anesthetics poorly in comparison to young adults. Similarly this classification ignores patients with malignancy (cancer). This scoring system could not be improved to a more elaborated and scientific form, probably because it is often used for price reimbursement.
Although more complex scoring systems like APACHE II exists [1] they are time-consuming to calculate, and do not have the same utility for ease of communication between surgeons, anesthetists, and insurers.
Some anesthetists now propose that like an ‘E’ modifier for emergency, a ‘P’ modifier for pregnancy should be added to the ASA score.[9]
Tags: Anesthesia
This entry was posted
on Friday, January 30th, 2009 at 4:36 am and is filed under Uncategorized.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
While anesthesia providers use this scale to indicate the patient's overall physical health or "sickness" preoperatively, it is regarded by hospitals, law firms, accrediting boards and other health care groups as a scale to predict risk,[10] and thus decide if a patient should have – or should have had – an operation.[11] To predict operative risk, age and obesity of the patient, the nature and severity of the operative procedure, selection of anesthetic techniques, the competency of the surgical team (surgeon, anesthesia providers and assisting staff), duration of surgery or anesthesia, availability of equipment, medicine, blood, implants and especially the
ASA stands for American Society of Anesthesiologists. In 1963 the ASA adopted a five category physical status classification system for assessing a patient before surgery. A sixth category was later added. These are:
A normal healthy patient.
A patient with mild systemic disease.
A patient with severe systemic disease.
A patient with severe systemic disease that is a constant threat to life.
A moribund patient who is not expected to survive with or without the operation.
A declared brain-dead patient whose organs are being removed for donor purposes.
If the surgery is an emergency, the physical status score is followed by “E” (for emergency) for example “3E”.
In 1940-41, ASA asked a committee of three physicians (Meyer Saklad, M.D., Emery Rovenstine, M.D., and Ivan Taylor, M.D.) to study, examine, experiment and devise a system for the collection and tabulation of statistical data in anesthesia which could be applicable under any circumstances.[1] This effort was the first by any medical specialty to stratify risk for its patients.[12] While their mission was to determine predictors for operative risk, they quickly dismissed this task as being impossible to devise. They state:
"In attempting to standardize and define what has heretofore been considered 'Operative Risk', it was found that the term ...
Trabeculectomy has undergone numerous modifications, e.g. filtering trepanotrabeculectomy (TTE) is a modification of the operation after J. Fronimopoulos. A triangular scleral flap is created which is approximately one-half as thick as the sclera. Trepanation is performed with a 2 mm trephine. The scleral edge of the trepanation opening is heat-cauterized.[1]
LASIK or Lasik (laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis) is a type of refractive laser eye surgery performed by ophthalmologists for correcting myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism.[1] The procedure is generally preferred to photorefractive keratectomy, PRK, (also called ASA, Advanced Surface Ablation) because it requires less time for the patient's recovery, and the patient feels less pain overall. However, there are instances where a PRK/ASA procedure is medically justified as being a better alternative to LASIK.[citation needed]
Many patients choose LASIK as an alternative to wearing corrective eyeglasses or contact lenses.
Tiletamine is a dissociative anesthetic and pharmacologically classified as an NMDA receptor antagonist. It is related chemically and pharmacologically to other anesthetics in this family such as ketamine and phencyclidine. Tiletamine hydrochloride exists as odourless white crystals.
It is used in veterinary medicine in the compound product Telazol (tiletamine/zolazepam, 50mg/ml of each in 5ml vial) as an injectable anesthetic. It is sometimes used in combination with xylazine (Rompun) to tranquilize large mammals such as bears and horses. Telazol is the only commercially available tiletamine product in the USA.
It is contraindicated in patients of an ASA score of III or greater and
Quick serum biomarker for fibrosis assessment. This simple index is made up of available; routine laboratory tests. The test has not been validated by Health Authorities. Inacuracy: 50% of the results are unclassifiable. Most authors conslude that APRI test appears most useful for excluding significant fibrosis in hepatitis C.
Hepascore (Australia)
A blood test combining the following clinical and laboratory variables: age, gender, bilirubin, GGT, hyaluronic acid, a2macroglobin to create a score.The test has very few validations.
Prior to 2005, donor lungs within the United States were allocated by the United Network for Organ Sharing on a first-come, first-serve basis to patients on the transplant list. This was replaced by the current system, in which prospective lung recipients of age of 12 and older are assigned a lung allocation score or LAS, which takes into account various measures of the patient's health. The new system allocates donated lungs according to the immediacy of need rather than how long a patient has been on the transplant list. Patients who are under the age of 12 are still given
The film's score was composed by Don Davis. He noted that mirrors appear frequently in the movie: reflections of the blue and red pills are seen in Morpheus's glasses; Neo's capture by Agents is viewed through the rear-view mirror of Trinity's motorcycle; Neo observes a broken mirror mending itself; reflections warp as a spoon is bent; the reflection of a helicopter is visible as it approaches a skyscraper. (The film also frequently references the book Alice's Adventures in Wonderland, which has a sequel entitled Through the Looking-Glass.) Davis focused on this theme of reflections when creating his score, alternating between
Subdermal implants are treated like many other body modifications in their aftercare. According to the Church of Body Modification, “The most important part of aftercare is keeping your sutures clean and dry[14].” They also suggest strategies of using paper versus cloth products (as cloth products can hold many bacteria) to clean and cover the area of the implant and cleaning the sutures with solutions designed for sterilization of piercings. After 10-12 days, the stitches can be removed. They also say it can take up to 3 months for the desired effect to be reached. As part of their philosophy, they
Leave a Reply